Discussion about this post

User's avatar
squarooticus's avatar

This would be a much better debate if the "No" position had a credible advocate instead of a progressive omnicause type who denies the very premise of the debate by questioning the sex binary. Even if you didn't intend it that way, this is like a straw man debate, set up to make one side seem like a joke. It's unserious. Try harder.

Luke J's avatar

I am sympathetic to several of Inez Stepman's criticisms of feminism, but I think they are rightfully overshadowed by feminism's progress since the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848.

I disagree with a lot of what Wendy Walsh prescribes as necessary to further the female cause, but it's hard to undervalue owning property and participating in marketplaces when measuring equality.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?